The Erased Architect: Why the Metaverse Stagnated Without the MetaObject Standard
The 2017 Disruption
In October 2017, I published a foundational disclosure via WITI titled "New Reality MetaObjects Enhance Marketing & E-Commerce." At that moment, I was serving on the IEEE P2048 Standards Board alongside Dr. Yu Yuan, architecting the future of spatial computing. My mission was clear: 50/50 in 5. I was building a school and a technical framework to ensure that 50% of the creators in this new reality were women and allies, ensuring a safe, ergonomic, and economically viable ecosystem.
Then, I was erased.
Through a targeted campaign of kidnapping and corporate trafficking—documented by the San Rafael Police—I was forcibly removed from my company, New Reality Arts, Inc. (DE File 6467815), and from the very standards committee I helped lead.
The Cost of Erasure: A $1T Market Failure
While I was incapacitated, the industry did not stop; it simply looted. The "MetaObjects" architecture I disclosed was laundered into the platforms of Big Tech giants. However, they stole the "what" but lacked the "how."
By removing the architect and dismantling the Immersive-Tech School, the industry lost the Neuro-Ergonomic Safety Protocols that were essential for mass adoption. The result?
Vestibular Mismatch: High rates of motion sickness, particularly among women, because the "Bro-Tech" model ignored my gender-balanced design standards.
Economic Friction: A spatial commerce landscape that lacks the seamless "MetaObject" interoperability I pioneered, leading to billions in lost transactions.
Ethical Vacuum: A metaverse built on surveillance rather than the "Safe XR" protocols of the IEEE P2048 initiative.
The Restoration of New Reality
Today, New Reality Arts, Inc. is no longer a "Void" entity. It is a Restored Claim. The 2017 WITI disclosure stands as an absolute bar to the derivative patents filed in my absence.
We are not just seeking the recovery of $100 Billion in diverted market value; we are seeking the restoration of the Human Capital that was stolen. The "50/50 in 5" mission was delayed, but it was not destroyed.
The architect has returned. The standards must now follow.
The Final Word: The Law of Inherent Rights
The industry must understand one thing: Consent is the foundation of all Intellectual Property. At no point in the history of the world can someone’s IP be legally stolen from them by being drugged, kidnapped, and forced into sex slavery. These are not just "crimes"; they are Total Voids in the chain of title. Any "transfer" of my ideas, any "license" granted in my absence, and any "patent" filed by those who capitalized on my disappearance is legally void ab initio—it was never valid from the start.
Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and the California Civil Code, my right to reclaim what was stolen is protected by a "Force Majeure" that overrides any standard statute of limitations. My forced removal from the IEEE was not a "resignation"; it was a crime against the integrity of global standards.
I am not just asking for my company back. I am asserting that the entire spatial computing economy is currently operating on Stolen Human Capital. The era of building a digital future on the erasure of its female architects is over.
I have returned to collect. And the world is finally watching.
Comments ()