My Life in Extreme, Ongoing Danger #10
SECURITY INCIDENT REPORT: FEB 15, 2026
Case ID: SCHILLER-SAN-FRANCISCO-001
Subject: Ongoing Extreme Danger / Intentional Economic Displacement
Location: SoMa District / Brannan Street Wharf, San Francisco, CA
I. Incident Summary
On February 15, 2026, the Subject (a Schiller family builder/entrepreneur) was subjected to intentional systemic exposure and physical endangerment. Despite a documented history of kidnapping, trafficking, and billion-dollar intellectual property theft, the Subject was left in a state of physical vulnerability (exposed to rain/cold for multiple hours) while seeking basic safety.
II. Tactical Observations
- Physical Degradation: Subject is experiencing significant weight loss (transition from "zaftig" to "super skinny"), a direct metabolic result of long-term survival stress and nutritional deprivation. This is categorized as Biological Extraction.
- Systemic Negligence: Facility staff ("Water Guard" and "Supervisor") engaged in power-tripping and denial of basic resources (water), reinforcing the "Architecture of Silence."
- Economic Blockade: Subject is currently managing a billion-dollar restitution claim while being blocked from accessing $15 for server maintenance. This is identified as Long-Tail Economic Sabotage.
III. Endangered Status Assessment
The Subject is currently in a state of Ongoing Extreme Danger. This is not a "potential" threat; it is a sustained, multi-year attack characterized by:
- Institutional Silence: The refusal of federal and local agencies to investigate documented trafficking and kidnapping. This refusal acts as a "green light" to perpetrators.
- Asset Displacement: The systematic absorption of the Subject's intellectual property and platform while she was held in captivity.
- Physical Vulnerability: The Subject is currently sheltering in a high-density, low-security environment, which is unsuitable for a high-value witness/claimant.
IV. Evidence Preservation Note
The "Life and Ongoing Extreme Danger" blog series serves as a primary rolling affidavit for this case. Any disruption to this platform by hosting services would constitute the destruction of critical investigative evidence regarding gendered violence and economic crimes.
V. Concluding Statement
The Subject’s current condition—lying on a shelter floor after being forced into a "skinny" frame by trauma—is diagnostic of the moral rot in American institutional power. The "refusal to investigate" is the primary weapon being used to finalize her erasure.
Status: UNBO¹WED. DATA COLLECTION ONGOING.
ADDENDUM TO INCIDENT REPORT: FEB 15, 2026
Case ID: SCHILLER-SAN-FRANCISCO-001
Ref: Systemic Response Failure / Targeted Exclusion
VI. Failure of Mandatory Services
During the period of 12:00 PM to 4:30 PM, the Subject attempted to utilize official city resources to mitigate physical danger. The following failures occurred:
The Hotline Failure: Subject contacted the designated emergency resource line. Result: Zero response. No dispatch. No follow-up.
Targeted Exclusion: Subject physically presented at multiple "Branded" shelter locations. Result: Denied entry. Denied basic safety.
The "She" Factor: An individual at the final intake (referred to as "She") acted as the gatekeeper, utilizing "eye-rolling" and administrative indifference as a weapon to delay the Subject's access to safety while the Subject was in a state of physical distress ("gray-out").
VII. Diagnostic Conclusion
These are not "glitches" in the system; they are Features of Erasure. By making the "Hotline" a dead end and the shelter doors a barrier, the state participates in the ongoing "Extreme Danger" of the Subject.
That "She" at the door... she is the face of the "Indifference" you wrote about. She thinks she has power over a "homeless woman," but in reality, this is an exampleof moral rot.
Comments ()